USAEYES-FRAUD.com: Glenn Hagele's Criminal Conduct Cited in Attorney's Motion to Withdraw from USAEYES/CRSQA Lawsuit

[Brent Hanson - USAEYES-FRAUD.com]

Glenn Hagele's Criminal Conduct Cited in Attorney's Motion to Withdraw
from USAEYES/CRSQA Lawsuit

http://www.usaeyes-fraud.com/glenn-hagele/glenn-hageles-criminal-conduct-cited-in-attorneys-motion-to-withdraw-from-usaeyes/crsqa-lawsuit.html

Glenn Hagele filed a frivolous lawsuit against Dr. Lauranell Burch in
North Carolina in December 2007. On December 14, 2009 Jonathan Sasser,
the attorney for Glenn Hagele, filed a motion to withdraw from
representation and cited the following provisions of North Carolina
Rules of Professional Conduct: 1.16(b(3) 1.16(b)(4) 1.16(b(5), The
portion of the North Carolina Rules of Professional Conduct which
Jonathan Sasser cited is:

Rule 1.16 Declining or Terminating Representation

(a) Except as stated in paragraph (c), a lawyer shall not represent a
client or, where representation has commenced, shall withdraw from the
representation of a client if:

(1) the representation will result in violation of law or the Rules of
Professional Conduct;

(2) the lawyer’s physical or mental condition materially impairs the
lawyer’s ability to represent the client; or

(3) the lawyer is discharged.

(b) Except as stated in paragraph (c), a lawyer may withdraw from
representing a client if:

(1) withdrawal can be accomplished without material adverse effect on
the interests of the client; or

(2) the client knowingly and freely assents to the termination of the
representation; or

--> (3) the client persists in a course of action involving the
lawyer’s services that the lawyer reasonably believes is criminal or
fraudulent; or

--> (4) the client insists upon taking action that the lawyer considers
repugnant, imprudent, or contrary to the advice and judgment of the
lawyer, or with which the lawyer has a fundamental disagreement; or

--> (5) the client has used the lawyer’s services to perpetrate a crime
or fraud; or

The document may be viewed at
http://www.scribd.com/doc/26424933/Jon-Sasser-Files-a-Motion-to-Withdraw-from-Representation-of-Glenn-Hagele-Based-on-Hagele-s-Criminal-Activity

or downloaded from
http://www.lasikfraud.com/crsqa/lauranell_burch/legal_docs/2009-12-December/2009-12-14_sasser_motion_to_withdraw.pdf

[Glenn - USAEyes.org]

These statements by Mr. Hanson are absolute falsehoods. The outrageous
accusations, manipulations, half-truths, outright lies, false
complaints, and attacks on me and others by Brent Hanson has caused
him some serious trouble.

Brent Hanson has a permanent restraining order against him for
threatening Dallas Lasik doctor William Boothe, MD with physical
violence, has been sued for defamation, lost, found in contempt of
court and sentenced to jail, is bankrupt, and I'm personally suing him
for defamation and invasion of privacy in California Superior Court
where two additional restraining orders have been issued against him.

To see the court documents with all the evidence, visit
https://services.saccourt.com/publicdms2/DefaultDMS.aspx, select
“Other” for case number format, enter 06AS00839, and then search.

Brent Hanson's former housemate is being sued in North Carolina
Superior Court for publicizing my personal identity including Social
Security number on her website. Her employer investigated how her
access to federal secure computer systems was used to publish
defamation on the Internet, the North Carolina distict attorney sent
her several cease and desist letters, and she uses so many aliases it
is hard to keep up.

Their attacks include lying about my financial history, insulting my
wife, publishing my personal identity including Social Security
number, bank account numbers, credit card numbers on their websites,
defamation, trademark infringement, listing doctors we have not
certified as recommended, harassing those who fund and govern our
nonprofit organization, and often doing this while hiding behind false
identities and multiple aliases.

Considering the work I do to advocate for Lasik patients and the
nonprofit patient advocacy I founded, their acts seem to have no logic
or reason. Even stranger is the fact that these people did not seek
our information before surgery and did not use doctors certified by
our organization, but you can't use logic and reason on illogical and
unreasonable people.

Rather than copy and pasting the details again and again, just
Google:

Brent Hanson
http://tinyurl.com/m9gjjx

Lauranell "Nell" Burch
http://tinyurl.com/mvtb3l

Or visit my personal website:

Brent Hanson
http://www.GlennHagele.com/BrentHanson/

Lauranell "Nell" Burch
http://www.GlennHagele.com/LauranellBurch/

USAEyes is a trademark of the Council for Refractive Surgery Quality
Assurance (http://www.USAEyes.org). The use of usaeyes.US, and other
use of USAEyes by Brent Hanson is not approved by Council for
Refractive Surgery Quality Assurance. Arbitration under the authority
of the Internet Corporation of Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)
found Brent Hanson's use of the USAEyes trademark inappropriate and
ordered the domains usaeyes.INFO, usaeyes.BIZ, usaeyes.NET transferred
to the Council for Refractive Surgery Quality Assurance.

See http://www.usaeyes.INFO

For those who would like to form their own opinion about the work I do
and the organization I founded, visit our Lasik patient advocacy
website at http://www.USAEyes.org and/or our Lasik Patient Forum
http://www.USAEyes.org/Ask-Lasik-Expert/

Glenn Hagele
Volunteer Executive Director
USAEyes (R)
Patient Advocacy Surgeon Certification

"Consider and Choose With Confidence" (TM)

Email to glenn dot hagele at usaeyes dot org

http://www.USAEyes.org

Lasik Bulletin Board
http://www.USAEyes.org/Ask-Lasik-Expert/

Mr. Hagele is not a doctor.

This transmission is on behalf of the Council for Refractive Surgery
Quality Assurance(TM) and is not endorsed, submitted, or
representative of any other organization or entity. Copyright Council
for Refractive Surgery Quality Assurance(TM). All rights reserved. All
Rights Reserved

[Scott]

"Brent Hanson - USAEYES-FRAUD.com" <***@anywhere.com> wrote in
message news:IJoen.9068$***@newsfe30.

[Scott]

"Brent Hanson - USAEYES-FRAUD.com" <***@anywhere.com> wrote in
message news:IJoen.9068$***@newsfe30.

[Glenn - USAEyes.org]

Friday, February 05,2010

James R. Donahue
Caulfield, Davies & Donahue, LLP
Post Office Box 277010 Attorneys for Hanson
Sacramento, CA 95827-7010 Hagele v Hanson
06AS00839

re: Demand for Immediate Removal and Cessation of Statement:
Glenn Hage1e's attorney files a motion to withdraw from representation
based on Hage1e's criminal activity

Mr. Donahue,

At the Internet webpage accessible through Unique Resource Locator
(URL)
http://www.******.com/doc/*********/Jon-Sasser-*****-*-*****-**-*****...
**-Glenn-Hagele-*****-**-******-*-********-********* your client has
published or caused to be published with a copy of a Motion For Leave
to Withdraw as Counsel, filed in The General Court of Justice Superior
Court Division, Wake County, North Carolina, case 7CVS19854, the
headline and body copy "Glenn Hage1e's attorney files a motion to
withdraw from representation based on Hage1e's criminal activity"

The relevant motion states the grounds are under North Carolina Rules
of Professional Conduct 1.16(b)(3), 1.16(b)(4) & 1.16(b)(5) (1997).
Rule 1.16(b)(3) reads; "the client insists upon pursuing an objective
that the lawyer considers repugnant, imprudent or contrary to the
advice and judgment of the lawyer". Rule 1.16(b)(4) reads; "the client
fails substantially to fulfill an obligation to the lawyer regarding
the lawyer's services and has been given reasonable warning that the
lawyer will withdraw unless the obligation is fulfilled". Rule 1.16(b)
(5) reads; "the representation has been rendered unreasonably
difficult by the client". None of these grounds make any accusation or
inference to criminal activity of any kind.
(http://www.aoc.state.nc.us/www/public/aoc/barrules. html)

Demand is herewith made that Mr. Hanson immediately stop publishing
the false statement that my counsel has moved to withdraw from
representation based on criminal activity and that Mr. Hanson take
prompt corrective action, absent which I shall have no choice but to
seek appropriate redress with the Court.

Mr. Hanson has made a written statement of fact, rather than opinion,
that violates my constitutional rights, places me in a false light,
tends to injure and in fact does cause injury to my occupation and
character, and/or exposes me to hatred, contempt, ridicule or shame.
Moreover, Mr. Hanson's written statement constitutes defamation per
se, which causes me substantial injury and interferes with my ability
to conduct my business.

I herewith demand of your client the following:

1. Immediately remove or cause to be removed those portions of all
publicly accessible Internet web pages he controls that include any
statements stating or inferring allegations of criminal activity
against me by my counsel Jon Sasser, including, but not limited to,
the statement published at URL
http://www.******.com/doc/*********/Jon-Sasser-*****-*-*****-**-*****...
**-Glenn-Hagele-*****-**-******-*-********-*********.

2. Immediately remove or cause to be removed any statements by Mr.
Hanson stating or inferring allegations of criminal activity against
me by my counsel Jon Sasser from the URL
http://www.******.com/doc/*********/Jon-Sasser-*****-*-*****-**-*****...
**-Glenn-Hagele-*****-**-******-*-********-*********
(i.e. the portion of the URL "Jon-Sasser-*****-*-*******-**-********-
****-
**************-**-Glenn-Hage1e-*****-**-Hagele-*-********-********").

3. Immediately remove or cause to be removed from all publicly
accessible newsgroup, bulletin board, or chat room statements by Mr.
Hanson stating or inferring allegations of criminal activity against
me by my counsel Jon Sasser.

4. Immediately privately retract all statements by Mr. Hanson stating
or inferring allegations of criminal activity against me by my counsel
Jon Sasser, that were distributed via email, conventional mail, or any
other private means.

5. Refrain from publishing, republishing, or communicating in any
manner to any third party the inference or statement that my counsel
Jon Sasser has made allegations of criminal activity against me.

If I do not receive by 5:00pm Tuesday 9 February 2010 a confirmation
from you that Mr. Hanson's statement has been removed as defined
above, I will seek injunctive relief from the Court that Mr. Hanson
refrain from making this defamatory statement.

Thank you in advance for your prompt attention to this matter.

/s/
Glenn Hagele

[Scott]

"Brent Hanson - USAEYES-FRAUD.com" <***@anywhere.com> wrote in
message news:IJoen.9068$***@newsfe30.ams2